Carbon management software for CBAM, CSRD and green lending. Your buyer asked for emissions data. Answer it.

Karbon360° is carbon management software that turns the invoices you already hold into a greenhouse-gas inventory a bank, customer or reviewer will accept — with locally accurate factors and a calculation trace behind every figure.

None of this is voluntary. The trigger is a buyer, a bank or a border.

Which is why the conversation is about acceptance, not sustainability

Three pressures, one desk.

Emissions data is reaching Balkan companies the way every compliance requirement does — from outside, with a deadline attached.

CBAM definitive regime

EU importers of steel, aluminium, cement, fertilisers, hydrogen and electricity must account for embedded emissions. They are collecting installation-level data from suppliers now; certificate purchases begin February 2027.

CSRD value-chain requests

Large EU companies report their value chains. Simplified and rescheduled by the 2025 Omnibus, but the direction is unchanged: their suppliers receive emissions questionnaires and scorecards.

Green-lending conditions

Sustainability-linked credit lines, often IFI-backed, increasingly require a GHG baseline at application and annual updates over the life of the loan.

Companies without a sustainability department.

The buyer inside the company is the CFO, the finance manager or the operations manager. They have the invoices. What they need is the calculation between the invoice and the answer to be correct and defensible.

Metals, cement, construction materials, fertilisers

Their EU importer needs installation-level embedded-emissions data — or falls back on default values that make the goods more expensive.

Food & beverage, textiles, furniture, components

Their customer's sustainability team sends a Scope 3 questionnaire with a deadline — and a supplier scorecard behind it.

Any company financing through a green credit line

The bank asks for a GHG baseline at application and annual reporting as a condition of the loan.

Carbon management software: invoices in, a number they accept out.

The same chain runs every month: what you already hold goes in, each step keeps its receipt, and the report comes out with the trace still attached.

Every step stores what it used — document, factor, version, arithmetic.

Nearly every real request is a request for Scope 1 and Scope 2 done properly.

Five screens between an energy bill and a filed report.

Nothing here is a mock-up. This is the product, in the languages your team already works in.

Drop the bill. It reads the rest.

Scan a supplier bill, type it manually or import a CSV. The platform reads the supplier, the meter and the billing period, then asks you to confirm anything it is less than 90% sure about.

Drill from a scope total to the litre of fuel behind it.

Slice the footprint by scope, source and facility, then open any group to see the individual fuels and activities underneath — with the record count behind each number.

The number you are not supposed to like.

Data quality is reported as separate dimensions, not a single flattering score — because any weighting would be a claim we could not defend. If 89% of your footprint is verifiable, it says 89%.

Open any record. The arithmetic is right there.

Every record carries its calculation trace: the activity as entered, the factor and its version, the server-recomputed result — and a flag when the stored figure no longer reconciles with the factor on file.

The whole product, not just the buttons.

The person entering invoices is rarely the person reading EU guidance. Karbon360 runs in Albanian, Macedonian, Bosnian, Serbian, Croatian and Turkish — including the findings, the warnings and the guidance text.

The buyer’s real question is never “is the report pretty?”

It is “will my bank or my customer accept this?” Everything in the platform serves that question.

Factors that match reality here

Calculations use locally accurate emission factors for the region's grids and fuels — not international averages. On some Balkan grids a European-average factor misstates the result by multiples.

Every figure shows its work

Each record stores the exact factor used, its version and a server-side recomputation. Any number in any report traces back to the data and factor that produced it.

Data quality without vanity

Coverage and reconciliation are reported separately, never blended into a score. When something does not reconcile, the report says so plainly — because a reviewer will notice anyway.

Evidence basis

Review expects at least 90% of a footprint to be verifiable. Karbon360 tracks that share continuously, so you know where you stand months before your reviewer asks.

Same product, a different door in each country.

Where the pressure comes from

Built where the pressure is arriving.

The tools available for answering these requests were built elsewhere. Generic international platforms calculate with European-average factors that misstate results in this region, produce polished reports whose numbers cannot be traced, and price for markets that have sustainability departments.

The bill for 2026 arrives in September 2027.

CBAM stopped being paperwork on 1 January 2026. Emissions embedded in goods imported since then carry a real price, payable in certificates. The data you need is historic — it cannot be reconstructed later.

What exporters actually ask.

No. Only the authorised CBAM declarant files — the EU importer of record, or an indirect customs representative acting for them. A producer outside the EU never touches the registry. But the declarant cannot file without your installation-level data, which is why the request lands in your inbox rather than theirs.

Through that buyer, yes. The de minimis exemption applies to the importer, not the producer, so the same factory can be exempt through one customer and fully in scope through another. Since you cannot predict which buyer will ask, the only workable position is to have the data ready before any of them do.

Business travel and employee commuting — the two categories customers ask for first. The boundary is stated explicitly in every report. The remaining categories are a roadmap decision, and we label roadmap as roadmap rather than implying coverage we do not have.

Because your reviewer will. Review normally expects at least 90% of the footprint to be verifiable, and most inventories start well below that. Showing you a comfortable number would only move the disappointment to the point where it costs you money.

You can, and they are deliberately set high — they exist to remove any incentive to withhold real data. For most producers in the region, particularly those on hydro-heavy grids, actual installation-level figures come in materially below the default. That gap is the entire commercial argument for measuring properly.

Albanian, Macedonian, Bosnian, Serbian, Croatian and Turkish, alongside English — including findings, warnings and guidance text, not just navigation labels. Reports still export in English for the EU buyer.

What 2026 actually costs.

See it against your own invoices.

Bring one month of energy bills and one production figure. In thirty minutes you will have a traced Scope 1 and 2 number for your facility — and an honest read on how much of it would survive review.